Sunday, October 2, 2011

Jesus is Jehovah in Ephesians!

Jesus is Jehovah in the New Testament: Index

1. INTRODUCTION
Continuing from part #11 "Jesus is Jehovah in Colossians!" in my series, "Jesus is Jehovah in the New Testament," which is based on

[Above (click to enlarge): Ephesus: The Toynbee Convector, April 3, 2007].

my morning "quiet time" Bible study, with this part #12, Jesus is Jehovah in Ephesians!

I have started using the English Standard Version (ESV) because it is more literal than the New International Version (NIV) and more modern than the American Standard Version (ASV).

I am actually up to "Jesus is Jehovah in Revelation!" in my morning Bible study, and when I have reached the end of that book, in a week or so, I will have completed that program of Bible study begun on 15 January 2008.

So I will probably begin a new program of Bible study, that of "Jesus is Jehovah! by topic," similar to those topics in my 2007 CED blog post, "Jesus is Jehovah!" In that case I may cease (at least for a while) posting this "Jesus is Jehovah in the New Testament" series and start a new "Jesus is Jehovah! by topic" series, e.g. "Jesus claimed to be Jehovah."

2. JESUS HAS NAMES AND TITLES OF JEHOVAH
Name. Jesus' name (which means "Jehovah is salvation"-Mt 1:21) is now exalted "far above ... every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come":

"With astonishing frequency-far more often than even many scholars have noticed-Jesus is identified as the Lord (that is, YHWH) of the Old Testament (Rom. 10:9-13; 1 Cor. 8:6; Phil. 2:9-11; 1 Peter 3:13-15). He is the King of kings and Lord of lords (Rev. 17:14; 19:16), the divine Savior (Titus 2:13; 2 Peter 1:11), the one who says `I am' or `I am he' (John 8:24, 28, 58), the first and the last, the Alpha and the Omega, and the beginning and the end (Rev. 1:7-8, 17b-18; 2:8; 22:12-13). The New Testament repeatedly and in a variety of ways makes the name of Jesus the center of Christian faith; he has the name that is above every name (Eph. 1:21; Phil. 2:9-11; Col. 3:17)." (Bowman, R.M., Jr. & Komoszewski, J.E., 2007, "Putting Jesus In His Place: The Case for the Deity of Christ," Kregel: Grand Rapids MI, pp..272-273).

Christians were "justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ" (1Cor 6:11); "baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts 8:16; 19:5); "assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus" (1Cor 5:4); and were to "do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus" (Col 3:17). Christians are to be "giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Eph 5:20).

"Thus all of these passages reflect various ways whereby the Divine Name that belonged to God alone in ancient Israel has now been transferred across the board to the One to whom that Name has now been given in its Greek form, kurios", i.e. "the Lord Jesus" (my emphasis):

"Even though Paul does not use the metaphor `to walk' as such, he ... assumes that everything believers do is done `in the name of the Lord Jesus.' Thus, in Col 3:17 ... Paul urges the believers in Colossae ... to do everything, whether word or deed, `in the name of the Lord Jesus.' Thus what identifies them as God's new people is also the context in which they are to live out that identification in its entirety ... In the companion passage in Eph 5:20, believers are urged especially in the context of worship to offer their thanksgiving to God `in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.' ... The point to make again, by way of conclusion, is that in every one of these instances where Paul uses the OT term `the name of the Lord,' the Divine Name is now `the Name' that was bestowed on Christ at his exaltation Thus all of these passages reflect various ways whereby the Divine Name that belonged to God alone in ancient Israel has now been transferred across the board to the One to whom that Name has now been given in its Greek form, kurios." (Fee, G.D., 2007, "Pauline Christology: An Exegetical-Theological Study," Hendrickson Publishers: Peabody MA, pp.567-568. My transliteration).

Savior. Jesus is "the saviour of the body" (Eph 5:23), i.e. the Church. Jesus is: "a Savior, who is Christ the Lord" (Lk 2:11); "the Savior of the world" (Jn 4:42; 1Jn 4:14); "God exalted him at his right hand as ... Savior" (Acts 5:31); "God has brought to Israel a Savior, Jesus" (Acts 13:23); "a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ" (Php 3:20); "our Savior Christ Jesus" (2Tim 1:10); "Christ Jesus our Savior." (Tit 1:4); "Jesus Christ our Savior" (Tit 3:6). Indeed, Jesus is: "our great God and Savior Jesus Christ" (Tit 2:13); "our God and Savior Jesus Christ" (2Pet 1:1); "our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ" (2Pet 1:11; 2:20; 3:18). Yet Jehovah is the only Saviour: "I, am Jehovah; and besides me there is no saviour." (Isa 43:11; Hos 13:4 ASV); "I, Jehovah ... a just God and a Saviour; there is none besides me. (Isa 45:21 ASV); "all flesh shall know that I, Jehovah, am thy Saviour" (Isa 49:26; 60:16).

Lord. Jesus is "the Lord Jesus Christ". (Eph 1:2; 6:23-24); "the Lord Jesus" (Eph 1:15). "the Lord" (Eph 2:21; 4:1,17; 5:8,10,17,19,22; 6:1,4,6-8,10,21). "our Lord" (Eph 3:11).

Note that Paul says there is only "one Lord, one faith, one baptism" (Eph 4:5). The NWT of Eph 4:5 has exactly the same:

"one Lord, one faith, one baptism." (my emphasis).

The NWT did not mistranslate the Gk. kurios by "Jehovah" here, so presumably the Watchtower admits that our "one Lord" is Jesus (as is clear from the context). But just in case a JW (or even the Watchtower) might try to claim that the "one Lord" is not Jesus but Jehovah, then the NWT of Jude 4 clearly states that "our only Owner and Lord" is "Jesus Christ":

"My reason is that certain men have slipped in who have long ago been appointed by the Scriptures to this judgment, ungodly men, turning the undeserved kindness of our God into an excuse for loose conduct and proving false to our only Owner and Lord, Jesus Christ."

As does 1Cor 8:6 NWT correctly state that, "there is one Lord, Jesus Christ":

"there is actually to us one God the Father, out of whom all things are, and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are, and we through him."

But then the Watchtower has a problem, because: 1) If Jesus is our "only Lord," and "there is one Lord"; 2) but Jesus is not Jehovah; then 3) Jehovah cannot be Lord. Only if Jesus is Jehovah, can Jesus and Jehovah be our "only Lord"!

The fact is that, by "There is one Lord' (eis Kurios) [Eph 4:5]" is the same words in the Greek Old Testament, the Septuagint of Zec 14:9, "And the LORD [Kurios] shall be king over all the earth. In that day shall there be one Lord [Kurios eis]..." (KJV). So "here the apostle ... adopting the very words of the ... Septuagint, applies them to Jesus Christ. ... [an] explicit declaration that he is the Eternal Jehovah":

"And here may be the most convenient place to introduce a few remarks on the witness we derive from the word `Lord.' .... But what of those very numerous instances in which it is applied to Jesus Christ? Therein he is described as `Lord of all:' [Acts 10:36] ... The collation of two passages from the Old, with two passages from the New Testament, seems to clinch the argument: `Hear, O Israel: the LORD our God is one LORD' (Kurios ho Theos emon, Kurios eis esti - LXX) [Dt 6:4]. `There is one Lord' (eis Kurios) [Eph 4:5]. `And the LORD shall be king over all the earth. In that day shall there be one Lord, and his name One (Kurios eis kaito onoma autou en-LXX) [Zec 14:9]. `To us...... there is...... one Lord (eis Kurios) Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.' [1Cor 8:6]. Here the apostle uses the very words to which the Jews clung with such tenacity as establishing the fundamental truth of the Unity of God; and adopting the very words of the common version, the Septuagint, applies them to Jesus Christ. There appears, therefore, in this name of Christ, as used in the New Testament, explicit declaration that he is the Eternal Jehovah." (Bickersteth, E.H., 1957, "The Trinity ," Kregel: Grand Rapids MI, Third Printing, 1965, pp.75-76).

Master (Lord). Jesus is our "Master [ho kurios] ... in heaven" (Eph 6:9).

Second Person of the Trinity. The three Persons of the Trinity: Father, Son and Holy Spirit, are mentioned together in at least four passages in Ephesians (my emphasis below):

Eph 2:18. "For through him [Christ] we both have access in one Spirit to the Father. "

Eph 2:22. "In him [Christ] you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit."

Eph 3:14-17. "For this reason I bow my knees before the Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth is named, that according to the riches of his glory he may grant you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit in your inner being, so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith-that you, being rooted and grounded in love,"

Eph 4:4-6. "There is one body and one Spirit-just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call- one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all."

"In Paul's letter to the Ephesians, within a brief compass he refers to the Trinity no fewer than four times":

"In Paul's letter to the Ephesians, within a brief compass he refers to the Trinity no fewer than four- times. The first mention describes the trinitarian nature of our approach to God: `For through Him (Christ) we both (Jew and Gentile) have access by one Spirit to the Father'. The word for `access' is that used of bringing a subject into the presence of his king, or as we would say `to have audience of' (Ephesians 2:18). The second reference describes the collaboration of the `Trinity' in our edification (Ephesians 2:22) `In whom (Jesus Christ, the chief corner stone, verse 20) you are builded together for a habitation of God through the Spirit.' Again the same pattern: In whom-Christ; to whom-God; through whom-the Spirit. The third passage is Ephesians 3:14-17, `For this cause I bow my knees to the Father, of whom the whole `repatriation' in heaven and on earth is named. That He would grant unto you according to the riches of His grace, that ye may be strengthened with power through His Spirit in the inner man, that Christ may come and take up His abode in your hearts by faith.' Thus for enjoyment of abiding fellowship we have the cooperation of the Father, the Holy Spirit, and Christ. Again Paul refers to the work of the Trinity in maintaining unification in His church (Ephesians 4:4-6) `One body, and one Spirit, even as you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all and through all and in all'. Here we have unity in tri-unity." (Bruce, F.F. & Martin, W.J., 1964, "The Deity of Christ," North of England Evangelical Trust: Manchester UK, pp.17-18).

"Paul's letter to the Ephesians ... may be one of the highest expressions of trinitarian faith in the New Testament":

"Paul's letter to the Ephesians, however, may be one of the highest expressions of trinitarian faith in the New Testament. God chose and predestined us to salvation through Jesus Christ and sealed us in the Holy Spirit (Eph. 1:3-14). On this basis Paul prays that the God of Jesus Christ may give to Christians the Spirit of wisdom and revelation (1:15-17). Of Christ he writes, `for through Him we both have our access in one Spirit to the Father' (2:18 NASB) and are becoming `...a holy temple in the Lord ...a dwelling of God in the Spirit' (2:21-22 NASB). Paul again prays, this time asking the Father to strengthen us through his Spirit so that Christ may dwell in our hearts and we thereby know Christ's love fully (3:14-19). He reminds us that there is `one Spirit... one Lord... one God and Father of all' (4:4-6). We should therefore not grieve the Holy Spirit, but forgive others as God has forgiven us in Christ (4:29-32). We are to be filled with the Spirit, giving thanks to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ (5:18-20)." (Bowman, R.M., Jnr, 1989, "Why You Should Believe in the Trinity: An Answer to Jehovah's Witnesses," Baker: Grand Rapids MI, Third printing, 1990, pp.130-131. Emphasis original).

For a devout, monotheistic Jewish rabbi, as Paul was, to repeatedly mention Father, Son (Christ) and the Holy Spirit together in close conjunction is inexplicable unless in Paul's mind they were each equal in Godhood.

God. "forgiving one another as in Christ God forgave you" (Eph 4:32 NIV). The RSV translates this:

"forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you"

and the NKJV has:

"forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you."

These two are faithful to the original Greek which is, kathos kai ho theos en Christos. Which is, as in the Watchtower's "Kingdom Interlinear Translation" (1985) correctly translates it,

"as also the God in Christ graciously forgave you" (my emphasis).

So this verse is saying that when Christ forgave the Ephesians, it was God who forgave them.

Son of God. Jesus is "the Son of God" (Eph 4:13; Mt 4:3,6; 8:29; 14:33; 26:63-64; 27:43; Lk 1:35; 22:70; Jn 1:34,49; 5:25; 11:27; 19:7; 20:31; Acts 9:20; Rom 1:4; 2Cor 1:19; Gal 2:20; Heb 4:14; 6:6; 7:3; 10:29; 1Jn 3:8; 4:15; 5:1,5,10,12,13,20; Rev 2:18). That Jesus is the "Son of God" means that He has the same nature as God the Father:

"Jesus was ... God's Son by nature":

"First, Jesus made it clear that the Father was his God in a unique manner compared with the manner in which the Father is our God. Thus, in John 20:17 Jesus stated, `I am ascending to my Father and YOUR Father and to my God and YOUR God' (NWT). Why did Jesus not simply say, `I am ascending to our Father and our God'? In fact, Jesus never spoke of the Father as `our Father,' including himself along with his disciples. (In Matt. 6:9 Jesus told the disciples that they should pray, `Our Father...,' but did not include himself in that prayer.) Jesus was careful to distinguish the two relationships, because he was God's Son by nature, whereas Christians are God's `sons' by adoption." (Bowman, 1989, p.72).

"The fact that Jesus is called the `Son of God' proves that He has the same divine nature as the Father":

"However ... the fact that Jesus is called the `Son of God' proves that He has the same divine nature as the Father. ... Ancient Semitics and Orientals used the phrase `son of ...' to indicate likeness or sameness of nature and equality of being. Hence, when Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, His Jewish contemporaries fully understood that He was making a claim to be God in an unqualified sense. ... from the earliest days of Christianity, the phrase `Son of God' was understood to be fully equivalent to God. This is why when Jesus made His claim, the Jews insisted, `We have a law, and according to that law he [Christ] must die, because he claimed to be the Son of God' (John 19:7, insert mine). Recognizing that Jesus was identifying Himself as God, the Jews wanted to put Him to death for committing blasphemy (see Leviticus 24:16)." (Rhodes, R., 1993, "Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah's Witnesses," Harvest House: Eugene OR, Reprinted, 2006, pp.242-243. Emphasis original).

That is because "the phrase `son of...' meant among the ancients. ... the ... meaning `of the order of':

"Jesus: The Eternal Son of God. The notion that the title Son of God indicates inferiority to the Father is based on a faulty conception of what the phrase `son of...' meant among the ancients. Though the term can refer to `offspring of' in some contexts, it actually carries the more important meaning `of the order of.' The phrase is often used that way in the Old Testament. For example, `sons of the prophets' meant `of the order of prophets' (1 Kings 20:35). `Sons of the singers' meant `of the order of singers' (Nehemiah 12:28). Likewise, the phrase `Son of God' means `of the order of God,' and represents a claim to undiminished deity. Ancient Semitics and Orientals used the phrase `son of ...' to indicate likeness or sameness of nature and equality of being. Hence, when Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, His Jewish contemporaries fully understood that He was making a claim to be God in an unqualified sense." (Rhodes, 1993, pp.242-243. Emphasis original).

"Jesus was ... the `one and only' ... Son of God who had come from the Father .... who shared his nature ... Unique sonship implies deity":

"As elsewhere in John, the title ho uios tou theou [the Son of God], which is in apposition to ho christos [the Christ] in John 20:31, denotes more than simply the Davidic Messiah. The Gospel was written to produce belief that Jesus was the promised Jewish Messiah and that this Messiah was none other than the `one and only' [monogenes] Son of God who had come from the Father (John 11:42; 17:8), who shared his nature (John 1:1, 18; 10:30) and fellowship (John 1:18; 14:11), and who therefore might appropriately be addressed and worshiped as ho theos mou [my God, lit. the God of me]. Unique sonship implies deity (John 5:18; cf. 19:7)." (Harris, M.J., 1992, "Jesus As God: The New Testament Use of Theos in Reference to Jesus," Baker: Grand Rapids MI, Reprinted, 1998, pp.124-125. Translations and transliterations mine).

"The designation `Son of God' ... was equivalent simply to equal with God'":

"The other designation-'the Son of God'-which Paul prefixes to this in his fundamental declaration concerning the Christ that he preached, supplies the basis for this. It does not tell us what Christ is to us, but what Christ is in Himself. In Himself He is the Son of God; and it is only because He is the Son of God in Himself, that He can be and is our Lord. The Lordship of Christ is rooted by Paul, in other words, not in any adventitious circumstances connected with His historical manifestation; not in any powers or dignities conferred on Him or acquired by Him; but fundamentally in His metaphysical nature. The designation `Son of God' is a metaphysical designation and tells us what He is in His being of being. And what it tells us that Christ is in His being of being is that He is just what God is. It is undeniable ... that, from the earliest days of Christianity on, (in Bousset's [Bousset, D.W., 1913, Kyrios Christos] words) `Son of God was equivalent simply to equal with God' (Mark xiv. 61-63; John x. 31-39)." (Warfield, B.B., 1970, "The Person and Work of Christ," Presbyterian & Reformed Publishing Co: Philadelphia PA, p.77).

"By the unique relationship which he [Jesus] was declaring existed between himself and `the Father,' he was making himself "equal ... with God":

"But perhaps his most emphatic claim to equality with the Father comes in 5:23 when he makes one's honoring of `the Father' turn on the issue of whether one honors `the Son,' that is, Jesus himself. With these words Jesus laid claim to the right to demand, equally with the Father, the honor (that is, the devotion and worship) of men! Is it any wonder, given the assumption of the religious leaders concerning him (that is, that he was only a man) that they thought him, under Jewish law (see Lev 24:16), to be worthy of death? By the unique relationship which he was declaring existed between himself and "the Father," he was making himself "equal [ison] with God" (5:18)." (Reymond, R.L., 2003, "Jesus, Divine Messiah: The New Testament and Old Testament Witness," Mentor: Fearn UK, p.230).

The "Jewish religious leadership correctly perceived that" Jesus "was claiming a Sonship with God of such a nature that it constituted .... equality with God":

"Jesus claimed by his `Son' sayings essential divine oneness with God in the Synoptic Gospels in Matthew 11:27 (Luke 10:22); 21:37-38 (Mark 12:6; Luke 20:13); 24:36 (Mark 13:32); and 28:19; and in the Gospel of John in (at least) 5:1 7-29; 6:40; 10:36; 11:4; 14:13; 17:1. To these must be added those instances in the Fourth Gospel when he claimed that God was his Father in such a unique sense that the Jewish religious leadership correctly perceived that he was claiming a Sonship with God of such a nature that it constituted essential divine oneness and equality with God and thus, from their perspective, was the committing of blasphemy deserving death (John 5:17-18; 10:24-39, especially verses 25, 29, 30, 32-33; 37, 38; see also 19:7)." (Reymond, 2003, pp.202-203).

"This is why, when Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, the Jews insisted, `We have a law, and according to that law he must die, because he claimed to be the Son of God'":

"Warfield affirms that, from the earliest days of Christianity, the phrase `Son of God' was understood to be fully equivalent to God. [Warfield, B.B., 1950, "The Person and Work of Christ,"p.77] This is why, when Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, the Jews insisted, `We have a law, and according to that law he [Christ] must die, because he claimed to be the Son of God' (John 19:7). Recognizing that Jesus was identifying Himself as God, the Jews wanted to put Him to death for committing blasphemy (see Leviticus 24:16)." (Rhodes, 1993, pp.242-243).

But the only grounds in the Law for executing a blasphemer is in Leviticus 24:16, where "anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death":

Lev 24:16. anyone WHO BLASPHEMES THE NAME OF THE LORD MUST BE PUT TO DEATH. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when HE BLASPHEMES THE NAME, HE MUST BE PUT TO DEATH.

Jesus "at his trial ... when he acknowledged that he was the `Son of God' ... his judges accused him of blasphemy worthy of death ... the basis of which judgment Jesus made no attempt to repudiate":

"More can be said-a great deal more-in favor of Jesus' claim, as the Messiah, to deity. ... he claimed as well to be the Son of God, not in an ethico-religious, in an official or functional, or in a nativistic sense of the title, but in what the church would later come to describe as the Sonship of the intra-trinitarian relation denoting essential oneness and sameness with the Father. This was clearly the case at his trial, for when he acknowledged that he was the `Son of God' (or `Son of the Blessed'), his judges accused him of blasphemy worthy of death (Matt 26:65-68; Mark 14:63-64; Luke 22:71), the basis of which judgment Jesus made no attempt to repudiate." (Reymond, 2003, p.202).

"Jesus' opponents here state explicitly that, by `blasphemy,' they mean that Jesus is in some way claiming to be God ":

"In John's Gospel, opponents of Jesus threatened to stone him for blasphemy, explaining, `Because you, though only a human being, are making yourself God' (John 10:33). In this instance, Jesus' opponents here state explicitly that, by `blasphemy,' they mean that Jesus is in some way claiming to be God. In context, Jesus has just claimed to do his works in the name of the Father (v. 25), to be the Shepherd of the sheep (vv. 26-27), to give eternal life to them (v. 28), and to prevent anyone from snatching them out of his hand, just as the Father does (vv. 28-29; cf. Deut. 32:39). He then concludes that, in asserting these divine prerogatives, he is claiming, `The Father and I are one' (John 10:30). It is not hard to see how Jesus' opponents drew the conclusion they did. Clearly, they understood Jesus to be claiming to do things that only God' can do." (Bowman & Komoszewski, 2007, p.239).

"Thus ... when the Jews say Jesus claimed to be `the Son of God,' they ... mean that Jesus claimed to be ... God's `Son' in a sense that made him ... on a par with God " which is why "they regarded his claim to be God's Son ... to be blasphemy":

"John reports that when Pilate told the Sanhedrin that he had no grounds to crucify Jesus, they replied, `We have a law, and according to that law he ought to die because he has claimed to be the Son of God' (John 19:7). This statement recalls both John 5:17-18-where Jesus' claim to work on the Sabbath just as his Father implies a claim to be uniquely God's divine Son-and John 10:28-33, where Jesus' statement that he and the Father are one provoked an explicit accusation of blasphemy. Thus, in John 19:7, when the Jews say Jesus claimed to be `the Son of God,' they clearly mean that Jesus claimed to be divine, God's `Son' in a sense that made him functionally on a par with God. In short, their reason for wanting Jesus dead remained consistent from John 5 through John 8 and 10 all the way to John 19: they regarded his claim to be God's Son-uniquely like him in his prerogatives, attributes, and works-to be blasphemy." (Bowman, 2007, p.240).

3. OLD TESTAMENT PASSAGES ABOUT JEHOVAH ARE APPLIED TO JESUS
Eph 4:8 = Ps 68:18 Paul in Eph 4:8 applies to Jesus Ps 68:18 which refers to Jehovah:

Eph 4:8 "Therefore it says, `When he [Christ] ascended on high he led a host of captives, and he gave gifts to men.'"

Ps 68:18 "You [Jehovah] ascended on high, leading a host of captives in your train and receiving gifts among men,."

This is so, even in the Watchtower's own New World Translation:

Ps 68:18 NWT. You [Jehovah] have ascended on high; You have carried away captives; You have taken gifts in the form of men, Yes, even the stubborn ones, to reside [among them], O Jah God.

Eph 4:8 NWT. Wherefore he says: "When he [Christ] ascended on high he carried away captives; he gave gifts [in] men."

"In the first passage, Christ is the focus; in the second, the LORD (Jehovah) God. There is no conflict; Jesus is the LORD (Jehovah) God""

"EPHESIANS 4:7-8: But to each one of us grace has been given as Christ apportioned it. This is why it says: `When he ascended on high, he led captives in his train and gave gifts to men.' Psalm 68:18 reads, `When you ascended on high, you led captives in your train; you received gifts from 'men, even from the rebellious--that you, O LORD God, might dwell there.' In the first passage, Christ is the focus; in the second, the LORD (Jehovah) God. There is no conflict; Jesus is the LORD (Jehovah) God." (Humber, P.G., 1997, "Jehovah Jesus: A Reference Handbook and Study Guide on the Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ," Skilton House Ministries: Philadelphia PA, p.73. Emphasis original).

This is but one of many examples where "Paul ... applied Old Testament passages in which God (Yahweh) is the subject directly to Jesus":

Jesus as `the Lord' ...Paul ... applied Old Testament passages in which God (Yahweh) is the subject directly to Jesus (see Isa 8:14 and Rom 9:32, 33; Joel 2:32 and Rom 10:12-13; Isa 40:13 and 1 Cor 2:16; Ps 24:1 [LXX, 23: l ] and 1 Cor 10:26 [see 10:21-22]; Ps 68:18 and Eph 4:8-10; Isa 45:23 and Phil 2:10), there can be no legitimate doubt that as `the Lord,' Jesus was, for Paul, divine and rightly to be regarded by others as such." (Reymond, 2003, p.428).

"On several occasions NT writers apply OT passages concerning Yahweh directly to Jesus":

"JESUS' IDENTITY WITH YAHWEH/JEHOVAH The NT attributes to Jesus many of the perfections of Yahweh (or, Jehovah), the creator/redeemer God of the OT. ... On several occasions NT writers apply OT passages concerning Yahweh directly to Jesus (Acts 2:34f.; Rom. 8:34; Heb. 10:12f.; 1 Pet. 3:22 apply Ps. 110:1. Rom. 10:13 applies Joel 2:32. Phil. 2:9-11 applies Is. 45:23. Jn. 12:41 applies Is. 6:10. Eph. 4:8 applies Ps. 68:18). These passages clearly identify Jesus with Yahweh." (Milne, B., 1982, "Know the Truth: A Handbook of Christian Belief," Inter-Varsity Press: Leicester UK, Fifth printing, 1988, p.129. Emphasis original).

"Things that are in the Old Testament said of Jehovah are in the New Testament said of Christ":

"The doctrine of the deity of Christ is crucial to the Christian faith. .... It can be demonstrated that he is God in several ways.... His identification with the Old Testament Jehovah. Things that are in the Old Testament said of Jehovah are in the New Testament said of Christ. He was the creator (Ps. 102:24-27; Heb. 1:10-12), was seen by Isaiah (Isa. 6:1-4; John 12:41), was to be preceded by a forerunner (Isa. 40:3; Matt. 3:3), disciplines his people (Num. 21:6f.; 1 Cor. 10:9), is to be regarded as holy (Isa. 8:13; 1 Pet. 3:15), is to lead captivity captive (Ps. 68:18; Eph. 4:8), and is to be the object of faith (Joel 2:32; Rom. 10:9, 13)." (Thiessen, H.C. & Doerksen, V.D., 1979, "Lectures in Systematic Theology," Eerdmans: Grand Rapids MI, Revised, pp.92-93. My emphasis).

"In the New Testament, there are passages in which what is said in the Old Testament concerning Jehovah is applied to Jesus Christ":

"In the New Testament, there are passages in which what is said in the Old Testament concerning Jehovah is applied to Jesus Christ. Compare Numbers 14:2; 21:5, 6; Ps. 95:9, with 1 Cor. 10:9. Here the tempting of Jehovah is the tempting of Christ. ... In Heb. 1:10, 11, what is attributed to Jehovah in Ps. 102:26, is attributed to Christ. In John 12:40, 41, it is asserted that the language of Isaiah (6:9, 10) concerning Jehovah refers to Jesus Christ. Isa. 45:23, compared with Rom. 14:10, 11 ... shows that the judgment-seat of God is the judgment-seat of Christ. ... Joel 2:32 compared with Rom. 10:13, proves that the name of Jehovah is the name of Christ. In Eph. 4:8, 9, Christ gives the gifts that in Ps. 68:18 are given by Jehovah." (Shedd, W.G.T., 1888, "Dogmatic Theology," Zondervan: Grand Rapids MI, Reprinted, 1969, Vol. I, p.315).

"Old Testament descriptions of God [Jehovah] are applied to him [Jesus]":

"Old Testament descriptions of God are applied to him. This application to Christ of titles and names exclusively appropriated to God is inexplicable, if Christ was not regarded as being himself God. The peculiar awe with which the term 'Jehovah' was set apart by a nation of strenuous monotheists as the sacred and incommunicable name of the one self-existent and covenant-keeping God forbids the belief that the Scripture writers could have used it as the designation of a subordinate and created being. Mat. 3:3 = `Make ye ready the way of the Lord'-is a quotation from Is. 40:3 = `Prepare ye ... the way of Jehovah.' John 12:41 = `These things said Isaiah, because he saw his glory; and he spake of him' [i. e., Christ] - refers to Is. 6:1 - `In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne;' So in Eph. 4:7, 8 - `measure of the gift of Christ ... led captivity captive `-is an application to Christ of what is said of Jehovah in Ps. 68:18. In 1 Pet. 3:15, moreover, we read ... `sanctify in your hearts Christ as Lord'; here the apostle borrows his language from Is. 8:13, where we read: `Jehovah of hosts, him shall ye sanctify.' " (Strong, A.H., 1907, "Systematic Theology," Judson Press: Valley Forge PA, Twenty-fifth printing, 1967, p.309).

4. JESUS HAS ATTRIBUTES OF JEHOVAH
Head. Jesus is "head over all things" (Eph 1:22). He is "the head" (Eph 4:15); "head of the church" (Eph 5:23).

All things in subjection to. God the Father has "put all things in subjection under his feet, and gave him to be head over all things to the church" (Eph 1:22).

Above all. Jesus is now exalted, "far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come." (Eph 1:21). But "Such was always his place in the universe because he is eternally God the Son (Jn. 3:31)":

"[Eph 1:21] Now the thought of the resurrection and exaltation of Christ leads rather to the declaration of him as Lord of all. His position is far above all rule and authority and power and dominion. Such was always his place in the universe because he is eternally God the Son (Jn. 3:31). To it he was exalted again after he had humbled himself to assume our humanity (Eph. 4:10)." (Foulkes, F., 1989, "The Letter of Paul to the Ephesians," The Tyndale New Testament commentaries, [1963 ], InterVarsity Press: Leicester UK, Second edition, Reprinted, 1991, p.72).

Almighty. The Greek word translated "almighty" is pantokrator which means "all-ruling" (Strong's Concordance):

3841. pantokrator, ...; from G3956 and G2904; the all-ruling, i.e. God (as absolute and universal sovereign):--Almighty, Omnipotent.

And Jesus is now all-ruling. He is now "seated at" the Father's "right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come." (Eph 1:20-21).

"Paul on occasions exploits language to its maximal limit to find terms in which to describe the absolute exaltation of Christ":

"Paul on occasions exploits language to its maximal limit to find terms in which to describe the absolute exaltation of Christ. To the believers in Rome he writes: `From whom (the Jewish nation) as concerning the flesh is Christ, who is over all, God blessed for ever' (Romans 9:5). When speaking to the Corinthian converts about the Cross as the focal point of their salvation, he goes on to say: `To us there is one God: the Father, of whom are all things, and we unto Him, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and we through Him' (1 Corinthians 8:6). To the Ephesians, he asserts: `(He is set) far above all hierarchy, and authority, and power, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come' (Ephesians 1:21). To the Colossian Christians he says: `In Him dwells the fulness of the deity bodily' (Colossians 2:9). Even in his short letter to Titus he must mention it: `Expecting the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and the Saviour Jesus Christ' (Titus 2:13)." (Bruce, F.F. & Martin, W.J., 1964, "The Deity of Christ," North of England Evangelical Trust: Manchester UK, p.19).

Omnipresent. The entire Church is "in the Lord" (Eph 2:21). Christ dwells in the hearts of all Christians (Eph 3:17; Rom 8:10; Col 3:17). Jesus now "fills all in all" (Eph 1:23); He "fill[s] all things" (Eph 4:10), that is He is omnipresent, as is Jehovah (1Ki 8:27; Ps 139:7-10; Jer 23:24; Acts 17:27):

"EPHESIANS 4:10: He who descended is the very one who ascended higher than all the heavens, in order to fill the whole universe. The Lord Jesus is the One who is to `fill the whole universe,' but so does Jehovah God. Jeremiah 23:24 reads, `Can anyone hide in secret places so that I cannot see him?' declares the LORD. `Do not I fill heaven and earth?' declares the LORD.' Can there be room for both the Lord Jesus and Jehovah God? The Lord Jesus Christ is Jehovah God. There is no conflict." (Humber, 1997, p.73).

"The Bible also names specific attributes unique to God that are possessed by Christ. He is ...omnipresent":

"The Bible also names specific attributes unique to God that are possessed by Christ. He is self-existent (John 5:26); unchanging (Heb. 1:10-12; 13:8); eternal (John 1:1-2; 8:58; 17:5; Col. 1:17; Heb. 1:2, 12), omnipresent, an attribute that JWs deny even to God ( Matt 18:20; 28:20; Eph. 1:23; 4:10; Col. 3:11); and beyond human comprehension (Matt. 11:25-27). This last point bears emphasizing. The biblical teaching that Jesus Christ is Jehovah, the Lord of all, God in the flesh, is found throughout the New Testament," (Bowman, 1989, p.110).

"Just as God is omnipresent in a personal sense ... so the New Testament describes Christ also as omnipresent":

"Jesus Christ Possesses the Attributes of God Omnipresence God is `in' everything; all of God is everywhere present at each point in the universe. That is what being omnipresent means. ... Just as God is omnipresent in a personal sense (Psalm 139:7; Proverbs 15:3), and thus is able to help, deliver, love, defend, and meet His people's deepest longings and needs, so the New Testament describes Christ also as omnipresent. Paul said that `He who descended is Himself also He who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things' (Ephesians 4:10). Christ told His disciples, `For where two or three have gathered together in My Name, there I am in their midst' (Matthew 18:20). He told them, `Lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age' (Matthew 28:20). Christ is said to indwell the hearts of all who place their faith in Him (Romans 8:9, Galatians 2:20, Ephesians 3:17, Colossians 1:27, Revelation 3:20). `... do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?' (2 Corinthians 13:5 ). How could a mere mortal, glorified or not, claim to indwell the hearts of believers around the world?" (McDowell, J. & Larson, B., 1975, "Jesus: A Biblical Defense of his Deity," Here's Life Publishers: San Bernardino CA, pp.51-52. Emphasis original).

Omnipotent. Each individual Christian is to "be strong in the Lord, and in the strength of his might." (Eph 6:10).

5. JESUS DOES WORKS OF JEHOVAH
Grace, peace and love. Jesus is with the Father the bestower of grace and peace (Eph 1:2; 6:23-24. Cf. Rom 1:7; 16:20; 1Cor 1:3; 2Cor 1:2; Gal 1:3; Php 1:2; 2Th 1:2; 1Tim 1:2; 2Tim 1:2; Tit 1:4; Phm 1:3; 2Pet 1:2; 2Jn 1:3).

"That Jesus is God incarnate is attested, as we have just argued, by Peter's description of him as `our God' (1:1) and by his being, with the Father, the co-source of grace and peace (1:2)":

"We conclude then that 2 Peter 1:1 takes its place alongside John 20:28, Romans 9:5, and Titus 2:13 as a fourth verse in which Jesus is described as being God by the Christological title of ... theos. While Peter's Christology in 2 Peter is not as full with respect to detail as in his first letter it is still the same high Christology `from above' which we observed there. That Jesus is God incarnate is attested, as we have just argued, by Peter's description of him as `our God' (1:1) and by his being, with the Father, the co-source of grace and peace (1:2)." (Reymond, 2003, p.492).

"... when Paul was writing a letter it was his habit to associate the Lord Jesus with the Father in his opening prayer ... This is very revealing. It shows us that Paul held the highest possible view of the Person of Christ. In the first place, only on this basis could he have bracketed the Son with the Father":

"The interesting thing for our present purpose is that when Paul was writing a letter it was his habit to associate the Lord Jesus with the Father in his opening prayer. `Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ' (Rom. 1:7), he wrote to the Christians at Rome, and a similar expression is found at the head of every one of his letters that has been preserved. This is very revealing. It shows us that Paul held the highest possible view of the Person of Christ. In the first place, only on this basis could he have bracketed the Son with the Father. In the second, he looks to Christ as the source of that grace and peace which he longs to be made available to his correspondents, wherever they might be." (Morris, L.L., 1974, "The Lord from Heaven," Inter-Varsity Press: Leicester UK, p.67).

"Paul designated both God the Father and the Lord Jesus as dispensers of grace and peace to the Church. ... Such a connection is possible only if God and the Lord reside at the same level in Paul's thought ... [it] indicates a functional identity between the Father and the Lord.":

"God, the Father, and the Lord. Jesus Christ Paul's letters generally followed the literary patterns of that day. ... his typical salutation read: `Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ' ... Paul designated both God the Father and the Lord Jesus as dispensers of grace and peace to the Church. ... Such a connection is possible only if God and the Lord reside at the same level in Paul's thought ...The phrase `God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ,' present in Paul's salutations, thanksgivings, and other doxological passages, indicates a functional identity between the Father and the Lord. They are jointly the source of grace and peace. Praise, thanksgiving, and blessing belong to them." (Capes, D.B. , 1992, "Old Testament Yahweh Texts in Paul's Christology," J.C.B. Mohr: Tübingen, Germany, pp.62-64, 68. Emphasis original).

Gifts: Grace is given to Christians "according to the measure of the gift of Christ." (Eph 4:7). When Jesus "ascended on high he led a host of captives, and he gave gifts to men ... And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers" (Eph 4:8,11).

Forgiveness. Christians are to "Be ... forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you." (Eph 4:32):

"Paul is so much in the habit of thinking of the Father and the Son as intimately related that he ascribes many gifts and graces indifferently to either":

"Paul is so much in the habit of thinking of the Father and the Son as intimately related that he ascribes many gifts and graces indifferently to either. Thus he can speak of the gospel as the gospel of God (Rom, 1:1), and a few verses later as the gospel of Christ (Rom. 2:16). The two are so close that it doesn't matter which name is used. Nor is this an isolated instance. Forgiveness is from God (Col. 2:13), or from Christ (Col. 3:13), or from God for Christ's sake (Eph. 4:32)." (Morris, 1974, p.68).

Rewards. Christians are to know that "whatever good anyone does, this he will receive back from the Lord". (Eph 6:8).

6. JESUS RECEIVES HONOUR AND WORSHIP DUE TO JEHOVAH
Faith. The Ephesian Christians are commended by Paul for their "faith in the Lord Jesus" (Eph 1:15).

King. God's kingdom is Christ's kingdom, i.e. it is "the kingdom of Christ and God" (Eph 5:5):

"EPHESIANS 5:5: `For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person-such a man is an idolater-has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.' We learn in this passage that Christ's kingdom is God's kingdom. Again, the Lord is placed in parallel with the heavenly Father. " (Humber, 1997, p.75. Emphasis original).

Singing to. speaking one to another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord; (Eph 5:19):

"SING TO THE LORD One of the most interesting aspects of the early church's devotion to Jesus Christ was their practice of singing hymns about him. Although the New Testament does not include a collection of the church's early hymns, we have three lines of evidence from the New Testament for this practice. ... First, at least one passage explicitly directs Christians to sing hymns to Jesus Christ: `Do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery; but be filled with the Spirit, as you sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs among yourselves, singing and making melody to the Lord in your hearts, giving thanks to God the Father at all times and for everything in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. (Eph. 5:18-20, emphasis added). Paul not only tells Christians to sing songs to the Lord Jesus, but he also urges them to sing to the Lord in their `hearts:' In other words, song and music in honor of Jesus are to be such a part of our lives that we find ourselves humming such hymns to ourselves or hearing them in our minds as we go about our daily routines. For Jews steeped in the faith of the Old Testament, to `sing to the Lord' meant to sing to Yahweh, the Lord God (Exod. 15:21; Judg. 5:3; 1 Chron. 16:23; Pss. 7:17; 9:11; 92:1; 95:1; 96:2; 104:33; Isa. 42:10). Yet, in context, Paul is speaking of singing to the Lord Jesus. Verse 20 refers to him as `our Lord Jesus Christ,' and the whole passage follows a Trinitarian pattern: `be filled with the Spirit ... singing and making melody to the Lord in your hearts ... giving thanks to God the Father' (vv. 18-20).' Paul again calls Jesus `the Lord' in verse 22. So Ephesians 5 testifies to the fact that, less than thirty years after Jesus' death and resurrection, singing to Christ-as `the Lord' was an expected, uncontroversial part of the Christian life." (Bowman & Komoszewski, 2007, pp.55-56. Emphasis original).

Praying to. Christians are to be "giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Eph 5:20).

Reverence for. We are to be "submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ" (Eph 5:21).

Submission to. The "church submits to Christ" (Eph 5:24).

Serve. We are to be "servants of Christ ... from the heart" (Eph 6:6), ."rendering service with a good will as to the Lord" (Eph 6:7).

7. OBJECTIONS TO JESUS BEING JEHOVAH
The Father is Jesus' God. "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ ..." (Eph 1:3 the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory ..." (Eph 1:17). cf. Rom 15:6; 2Cor 1:3; 11:31; 1Pet 1:3 and Mt 27:46; Mk 15:34; Jn 20:17; Rev 3:2,12.

There is no valid objection: "The title `God of our Lord Jesus Christ' places the emphasis on Christ's human nature, and `Father of our Lord Jesus Christ' calls attention to the Son's divine nature":

"[Rom 15:6] The expression `The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ' (cf. II Cor. 1:3; 11:31; Eph. 1:3; I Peter 1:3) should present no difficulty. The title `God of our Lord Jesus Christ' places the emphasis on Christ's human nature, and `Father of our Lord Jesus Christ' calls attention to the Son's divine nature, for not nativistic but trinitarian sonship is referred to here, a kind of sonship in which Christ, by whatever name he is called, is placed on a par with the Father and the Spirit. ... See also Matt. 27:46 (= Mark 15:34) and John 20:17." (Hendriksen, W., "Romans: Volume 2: Chapters 9-16," New Testament Commentary, The Banner of Truth Trust: Edinburgh, 1980, pp.473-474. Emphasis original).

"... it is evident that if the title `God of our Lord Jesus Christ' places emphasis on Christ's human nature, that of `Father of our Lord Jesus Christ calls attention to the Son's divine nature":

"[Eph 1:3] Since Jesus was and is not only God but also man, and since he himself addressed the first Person of the Trinity as `my God' (Matt. 27:46), it is evident that the full title `the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ' is justified. As to the term `Father,' it is evident that if the title `God of our Lord Jesus Christ' places emphasis on Christ's human nature, that of `Father of our Lord Jesus Christ calls attention to the Son's divine nature, for not nativistic but trinitarian sonship is referred to in this thoroughly trinitarian epistle, in which the Beloved, by whatever name he is called, is constantly placed on a par with, and mentioned in one breath with, the Father and the Spirit (2:18; 3:14-17; 4:4-6; 5:18-20)." (Hendriksen, W., 1972, "Ephesians," Banner of Truth: Edinburgh UK, 1967, British edition, pp.72-73. Emphasis original).

"The phrase `God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ'" expresses "the double filiation of the Son, His trinitarian Sonship and that of His humanity as the Sent of the Father."
"[Eph 1:3] The phrase `God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ' seems to express the double filiation of the Son, His trinitarian Sonship and that of His humanity as the Sent of the Father." (Simpson, E.K., 1957. "Commentary on the Epistles of Paul to the Ephesians," Marshall, Morgan & Scott: London, p.24).

"The son of a king may be officially subordinate and yet equal in nature to his father":

"[1Cor 15:27-28] The statement that the Son also himself shall be subject to God has been thought by some to lower the dignity of the Son of God, as well as, possibly, to cast a reflection on his deity. The subjection, however, is not that of the Son as Son, but as the incarnate Son. This, of course, does not involve inequality of essence. The son of a king may be officially subordinate and yet equal in nature to his father ... Paul's point is this: The Son as incarnate Son has all power now (cf. Mt 28:18). When he delivers up the administration of 'the earthly kingdom to the Father, then the triune God will reign as God and no longer through the incarnate Son. Messiahship is a phase of the Son's eternal Sonship ....." (Johnson, S.L., "I Corinthians," in Pfeiffer, C.F. & Harrison, E.F., 1962, eds., "The Wycliffe Bible Commentary," Oliphants: London, Reprinted, 1963, p.1257).

See also my Jesus is Jehovah in Matthew on Mt 27:46; Jesus is Jehovah in Romans on Rom 15:6; and Jesus is Jehovah in 2 Corinthians on 2Cor 1:3; 11:31.

One God and Father. If a Jehovah's Witness claims that because Paul wrote that there is "one God and Father of all" (Eph 4:6) and therefore Jesus cannot be God, then by that same logic, because the preceding verse

Eph 4:5 says there is only "one Lord" (and Jesus many times is called "Lord", including that "Jesus is Lord" - Rom 10:9; 1Cor 12:3; Php 2:11 and that "and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ 1Cor 8:5-6). ), then Jehovah cannot be Lord! See also my Jesus is Jehovah in 1 Corinthians on 1Cor 8:6.

8. CONCLUSION
Therefore, on the basis of the above positive evidence in Ephesians for Jesus being Jehovah and the lack of any valid objection against, then I conclude that Jesus is Jehovah in Ephesians!

My next part #13, in assumed chronological order, would normally be "Jesus is Jehovah in Luke!" But as previously mentioned, this may be the last (at least for a while), of this series "Jesus is Jehovah in the New Testament."

Stephen E. Jones.
My other blogs: CreationEvolutionDesign & The Shroud of Turin

Saturday, September 24, 2011

`Rutherford did not "invent" the name Jehovah's Witnesses'

Scott

Thank you for your comment of June 1, 2011 on my post "`What Does the Bible Really Teach?' pp.7-14". At the time I briefly

[Above: A reproduction of the 1931 International Bible Students Association Convention program cover. As its pro-JW "Our Theocratic Heritage" caption says, it "raised a great deal of interest because no one knew what the `J.W.' on it meant-until it was announced that they would take on a new name- `Jehovah's Witnesses'!" (my emphasis).]

responded that because of its length and multiple points raised in your comment, I would answer it in a separate post. I have now moved house, unpacked my books, so I hope now to begin catching up on my backlog! Your words are >bold to distinguish them from mine.

>Briefly reviewed some of your blog content while searching for some other information. However, I thought it important to make a comment on a few points you made.
>
>First, Mr. Rutherford did not "invent" the name Jehovah's Witnesses.

In the context I made it clear what I meant by "invent", i.e. "the name `Jehovah's Witnesses' was not used until it was invented by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society's second President `Judge' Joseph Franklin Rutherford (1869-1942) in 1931":

"Also the name `Jehovah's Witnesses' was not used until it was invented by `Judge' Rutherford in 1931, i.e. 52 years after Charles Taze Russell founded the Watchtower Society in 1879. (see `tagline': "JWs Proclaimers").

As the quote referred to stated, `Judge' Rutherford "presented another resolution, this one entitled `A New Name,' which was climaxed by the declaration: `We desire to be known as and called by the name, to wit, Jehovah's witnesses. ... They would henceforth be known as Jehovah's Witnesses!" (my emphasis):

"A milestone, though, was reached at a convention held in Columbus, Ohio, in 1931. On Sunday, July 26, at noon, Brother Rutherford delivered the public discourse `The Kingdom, the Hope of the World,' which was broadcast over a vast radio hookup, with more than 300 additional stations later rebroadcasting the message. At the end of the discourse, Brother Rutherford served notice on Christendom by reading a stinging resolution entitled `Warning From Jehovah,' which was addressed `To the Rulers and to the People.' To his invitation that they adopt the resolution, the entire visible audience stood and shouted, `Aye!' Telegrams later received indicated that many of those listening on the radio likewise raised their voices in agreement. From one o'clock, when the public discourse was finished, until four o'clock, when Brother Rutherford reentered the auditorium, the atmosphere was charged with excitement. Brother Rutherford had specially requested that everyone who was really interested in the noonday warning to Christendom be in his seat at four o'clock. Promptly at four, Brother Rutherford began by stating that he regarded what he was about to say as of vital importance to everyone who could hear his voice. His listeners were keenly interested. During his discourse he presented another resolution, this one entitled `A New Name,' which was climaxed by the declaration: `We desire to be known as and called by the name, to wit, Jehovah's witnesses. `The thrilled convent' again jumped to their feet with the ringing shout `Aye!' They would henceforth be known as Jehovah's Witnesses!" (WB&TS, "Jehovah's Witnesses, Proclaimers of God's Kingdom," Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn NY, 1993, pp.79,82. Emphasis original).

That the name "Jehovah's Witnesses" was a new invention of `Judge' Rutherford is evident in that none of those present at the 1931 Columbus Ohio Convention could not even guess what the initials "J.W." stood for, until Rutherford told them:

"In exalting Jehovah's name, however, the convention of God's people at Columbus, Ohio, July 24-30, 1931, was a milestone. . It was unique in that extension conventions were scheduled for 165 other places throughout the earth. But that was not the most important factor. There was something much more significant. It was linked with the enigmatic letters `JW' appearing on the printed assembly program and the title page of The Messenger, the convention newspaper-in fact, seen in many places. `When we got near the assembly grounds,' remarks Burnice E. Williams, Sr., `we saw "JW" all over the place. But not knowing what it stood for, we were all wondering, "What is this JW for?"' Sister Herschel Nelson recalls: `Speculations were made as to what JW stood for-Just Wait, Just Watch, and the correct one ..." (WB&TS, "1975 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses," Watchtower Bible & Tract Society: Brooklyn NY, 1975, p.149).

>They name is derived from Scripture, namely Is. 43:10; "You are my witnesses, Saith Jehovah..." (American Standard Version)

First, those two words "Jehovah's Witnesses" do not appear together in that verse, nor are they in that order, even in your own New World Translation:

Isa 43:10 NWT "YOU are my witnesses," is the utterance of Jehovah, "even my servant whom I have chosen, in order that YOU may know and have faith in me, and that YOU may understand that I am the same One. Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none."

Second, the Watchtower admits that, the name "Jehovah's Witnesses" "was revealed on Sunday, July 26, 1931, when ... conventioners [at the Society's 1931 Convention held at Columbus Ohio] ... adopted a resolution presented by J. F. Rutherford and entitled `A New Name'" (my emphasis):

"The meaning of `JW' was revealed on Sunday, July 26, 1931, when thrilled conventioners heartily adopted a resolution presented by J. F. Rutherford and entitled `A New Name.' It said, in part: ... therefore we joyfully embrace and take the name which the mouth of the Lord God has named, and we desire to be known as and called by the name, to wit, Jehovah's witnesses.'" (WB&TS, 1975, pp.149-150).

So those two words, "Jehovah's Witnesses" were invented by `Judge' Rutherford. And what's more, it wasn't for any Biblical or theological reason, but for the purely political reason of, "an effort to distance his followers from the" followers of the Society's first President, Charles Taze Russell (1852 -1916):

"Jehovah's Witnesses To members of the sect the designation `Jehovah's Witnesses' is no mere denominational name; rather, it identifies them as God's earthly witnesses to mankind. They believe that God gave them this name when he inspired Isaiah 43:10, `'YOU are my witnesses,' is the utterance of Jehovah...' (NWT) In actuality it was Watchtower president Joseph Rutherford who selected the name. On July 26,1931 he presented a resolution to assembled followers, asking them to approve the new name `Jehovah's Witnesses.' Prior to that time they had referred to themselves as `Bible Students,' whereas orthodox Christians called them `Russellites.' Following the death of founder Charles Taze Russell, his successor J. F. Rutherford's authoritarian methods provoked a schism among the Bible Students, with some adhering to the Watchtower corporation while others formed competing groups. It was in an effort to distance his followers from the latter that Rutherford proposed the new name `Jehovah's Witnesses.'" (Reed, D.A., "Answering Jehovah's Witnesses: Subject by Subject," [1996], Baker: Grand Rapids MI, Second printing, 1998, pp.144-145. Emphasis original).

Third, in the context, Jehovah was speaking to "Israel" in the 6th century BC, not to Americans in the 20th century AD, as the opening verses of Isaiah chapter 43 in the NWT make clear:

Isa 43:1-3 NWT. And now this is what Jehovah has said, your Creator, O Jacob, and your Former, O Israel: "Do not be afraid, for I have repurchased you. I have called [you] by your name. You are mine. 2 In case you should pass through the waters, I will be with you; and through the rivers, they will not flood over you. In case you should walk through the fire, you will not be scorched, neither will the flame itself singe you. 3 For I am Jehovah your God, the Holy One of Israel your Savior. I have given Egypt as a ransom for you, E•thi•o´pi•a and Se´ba in place of you.

"In context, Isaiah 43:10 is referring strictly to Israel as a collective witness to God's majesty, authority, faithfulness, and truth" (emphasis original):

"Isaiah 43:10-'Witnesses' of Jehovah? The Watchtower Teaching. The New World Translation renders Isaiah 43:10, `'You are my witnesses,' is the utterance of Jehovah, `even my servant whom I have chosen.' Appropriating this verse for themselves, the Jehovah's Witnesses believe that out of all the religious groups on planet earth, they alone are chosen by God and have been deemed His `witnesses.' The Biblical Teaching. In context, Isaiah 43:10 is referring strictly to Israel as a collective witness to God's majesty, authority, faithfulness, and truth. This is in marked contrast to pagans who cannot witness to such attributes in their false gods. Israel as a witness was to testify that Yahweh is the only true God. Now, here is the point to emphasize: It is a wild, wild leap to take a verse referring to Israel as God's witness to the pagan nations in Old Testament times (over seven centuries before the time of Christ) and claim its fulfillment in a modern-day religious group some nineteen centuries after the time of Christ. This is a classic example of what James W. Sire calls `Scripture twisting.'" (Rhodes, R., "Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah's Witnesses," Harvest House: Eugene OR, 1993, Reprinted, 2006, p.29. Emphasis original).

As former Watchtower Society Governing Body member, the late Raymond Franz, correctly pointed out, "This scripture, however, simply presents a figurative court scene, in which all nations are gathered and before whom the Israelites are called upon by God to bear testimony to His saving power exercised on their behalf" (my emphasis):

"It was in 1931 that Joseph F. Rutherford, Russell's successor to the Watch Tower presidency, selected the name of `Jehovah's Witnesses' for the organizational membership. Rutherford stated that the name chosen was `the name which the mouth of the Lord God has named, and we desire to be known as and called by the name, to wit, `Jehovah's Witnesses.' Isaiah 43:10-12; 62:2 and Revelation 12:17 were cited as basis for the adoption of this name. [Jehovah's Witnesses in the Divine Purpose, pages 125, 126] A reading of these passages, however, does not in any way reveal that God purposed that his words there spoken were to be formed into a distinctive name for Christians to bear as much as 2,600 years later. Isaiah 43:10-12 is the primary text used by the organization to justify its chosen name. This scripture, however, simply presents a figurative court scene, in which all nations are gathered and before whom the Israelites are called upon by God to bear testimony to His saving power exercised on their behalf. Why, out of all the statements God makes regarding the nation of Israel, should these words become `the name which the mouth of the Lord God has named' to be placed upon Christians today?" (Franz, R., "In Search of Christian Freedom," [1991], Commentary Press: Atlanta GA, Second edition, 2007, pp.489-490. Emphasis original).

Fourth, the Watchtower ignores the remainder of the same verse, in which Jehovah states, even in the Society's own New World Translation, that "Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none.":

Isa 43:10 NWT "YOU are my witnesses," is the utterance of Jehovah, "even my servant whom I have chosen, in order that YOU may know and have faith in me, and that YOU may understand that I am the same One. Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none."

Yet "despite the testimony of Scripture that `before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me' (Is 43:10, KJV) , the `a god' fallacy [in John 1:1 NWT] is pursued and taught by Jehovah's Witnesses in direct contradiction to God's Word":

"Since Jehovah is the only God, then how can the Logos be `a god,' a lesser god than Jehovah, as Jehovah's Witnesses declare in John 1:1? (Emphatic Diaglott and NWT). Many times Jehovah declares His existence as the `only' God and Saviour (Is 41:4; 43:11-13; 44:6; 45:5; 48:12). This is indeed irrefutable proof, since Christ could not be our Saviour or Redeemer if He were not Jehovah, for Jehovah is the only Saviour (Is 43:11). However, despite the testimony of Scripture that `before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me' (Is 43:10, KJV) , the `a god' fallacy is pursued and taught by Jehovah's Witnesses in direct contradiction to God's Word." (Martin, W.R. & Klann, N., "Jehovah of the Watchtower," [1953], Bethany House Publishers: Bloomington MN, Revised, 1981, pp.57-58. Emphasis original).

"In view of such passages [as Dt 32:39; Isa 43:10; 44:8; 45:5], it is patently obvious that the interpretation of John 1:1 that which argues for both a `God Almighty' and a lesser `god' cannot be reconciled with the rest of Scripture":

"Only One True God Having shown that the Watchtower Society consistently misrepresents what various scholars have said about John 1:1, you must then emphasize that the polytheistic teaching that there is both a `God Almighty' and a lesser `mighty god' goes against the clear teaching of Scripture that there is only one true God (e.g., John 17:3). Note, for example, the following key passages from the Old Testament: o `See now that I, I am He, And there is no god besides Me' (Deuteronomy 32:39 NASB, emphasis added). o `Before Me there was no God formed, and there will be none after Me' (Isaiah 43:10 NASB, emphasis added). o `Is there any God besides Me, or is there any other Rock? I know of none' (Isaiah 44:8 NASB, emphasis added). o `I am the LORD, and there is no other; besides Me there is no God' (Isaiah 45:5 NASB, emphasis added). In view of such passages, it is patently obvious that the interpretation of John 1:1 that which argues for both a `God Almighty' and a lesser `god' cannot be reconciled with the rest of Scripture. Ask ... How do you reconcile Jehovah-God's statement in Deuteronomy 32:39 that `there is no god besides me' as well as His statement in Isaiah 45:5 that `besides Me there is no God'-with the Watchtower teaching that there is both a `God Almighty' and a `mighty god'?"(Rhodes, R., "Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah's Witnesses," Harvest House: Eugene OR, 1993, Reprinted, 2006, pp.105-106. Emphasis original).

"Although Jehovah clearly said, `Before Me there was no God formed, and there will be none after Me' (Isa. 43:10) ... Jehovah's Witnesses, will not believe Him. ... [they] translate John 1:1, `In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god'" (my emphasis):

"The common pagan opinion was that the world is populated by many gods. Such people who believe in the existence of more than one god are called polytheists. ... Although Jehovah clearly said, `Before Me there was no God formed, and there will be none after Me' (Isa. 43:10), some pseudo-Christian groups, like the ... Jehovah's Witnesses, will not believe Him. ... Jehovah's Witnesses are polytheists. ... Jehovah's Witnesses translate John 1:1, `In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.' Jehovah's Witnesses do not believe Jesus (the Word) is the God, but another god! There is no way John could have meant that Jesus was a god. John was a Jewish Christian, a monotheist! He did not believe there were any other gods! That is why most recognized translations will read `and the Word was God." (Magnani, D. & Barrett, A., "The Watchtower Files: Dialogue with a Jehovah's Witness," Bethany House Publishers: Bloomington MN, 1985, pp.123-124. Emphasis original).

"... Jehovah's Witnesses. Ironically, the passage of Scripture on which this name is based ... states that the primary truth to which those witnesses were to testify was that Jehovah is the only God and the only Savior (Isa. 43:10-11) ... By their teaching that Jesus was a created god and a divine savior under Jehovah, the Jehovah's Witnesses prove themselves unfaithful witnesses" (my emphasis):

"Who Is on Jehovah's Side? Jehovah's Witnesses take great pride in their constant use of the name Jehovah, even to the point of calling themselves Jehovah's Witnesses. Ironically, the passage of Scripture on which this name is based indicates that they are not faithful witnesses to Jehovah, since it states that the primary truth to which those witnesses were to testify was that Jehovah is the only God and the only Savior (Isa. 43:10-11). By their teaching that Jesus was a created god and a divine savior under Jehovah, the Jehovah's Witnesses prove themselves unfaithful witnesses. True witnesses to Jehovah will accept the Bible which Jehovah inspired and preserved through the centuries with his message intact (Isa. 40:8; 55:10-11; Matt. 5:18). They will therefore reject the New World Translation, which adds to God's word to change its clear teaching that Jehovah is no longer concerned that we use that name, and makes many other doctrinally significant alterations of God's word (Prov. 30:6)." (Bowman, R.M., Jr., "Understanding Jehovah's Witnesses: Why They Read the Bible the Way They Do," Baker: Grand Rapids MI, 1991, pp.121-122. Emphasis original).

Fifth, "In the OT God commissions his people ` "You are my witnesses," declares the LORD' (Is. 43:10); yet in Acts 1:8 Jesus sends out his apostles with identical words `You will be my witnesses" (my emphasis):

"God's witness One final link between Jesus and Yahweh may be noted. In the OT God commissions his people ` "You are my witnesses," declares the LORD' (Is. 43:10); yet in Acts 1:8 Jesus sends out his apostles with identical words `You will be my witnesses'." (Milne, B., "Know the Truth: A Handbook of Christian Belief," [1982], Inter-Varsity Press: Leicester UK, 1988, Fifth printing, pp.131-132. Emphasis original).

Which is more evidence that Jesus is Jehovah, come in the flesh!

>Second, One of your challenge questions for the publications "What does the Bible Really Teach?" was, "If someone one a desert island had only the Bible, would they come to the same understanding as Jehovah's Witnesses?"

Yes. If what the Watchtower taught was what the Bible taught, then if someone read only the Bible they would come to believe what the Watchtower teaches. But the Watchtower admitted that if a JW "read the Bible exclusively" then they will come to believe what Christianity teaches:

"From time to time, there have arisen from among the ranks of Jehovah's people those who ... say that it is sufficient to read the Bible exclusively, either alone or in small groups at home. But, strangely, through such 'Bible reading,' they have reverted right back to the apostate doctrines that commentaries by Christendom's clergy were teaching 100 years ago ..." ("Serving Jehovah `Shoulder to Shoulder'," Watchtower, Aug 15, 1981, pp.28-29, p.29).

>Presuming you believe this an incisive and not a disingenuous question would require the reader to also understand that you deny Phillip's apostolic account of the Ethiopian eunuch who responded to Phillip's question, ?Do you understand what you are reading?" with "How can I,..."unless someone explains it to me??

That is a fallacious example because it was only in Acts 8 when: 1) the New Testament had not yet been written; and 2) the Ethiopian Eunuch had not yet heard about Jesus, as your own NWT states, "Philip ... declared to him the good news about Jesus" (my emphasis):

Acts 8:34-35 NWT "34 In answer the eunuch said to Philip: "I beg you, About whom does the prophet say this? About himself or about some other man?" 35 Philip opened his mouth and, starting with this Scripture, he declared to him the good news about Jesus. "

>As for Jesus being Jehovah, certainly we would disagree. Jesus Christ, known to the world as the Savior, has a name that means "Jehovah is Salvation".

Indeed! Thanks for helping me make my point that Jesus is Jehovah, come in the flesh.

>The title Christ means "Anointed One". One does not anoint oneself. Who anointed Jesus? Math. 3:17 "This is my Son, The one whom I have approved."

Thanks for bringing up one of the many Trinitarian passages of the New Testament, even in the Watchtower's own Bible, where Father, Son and Holy Spirit are mentioned together:

Mat 3:16-17 NWT. 16 After being baptized Jesus immediately came up from the water; and, look! the heavens were opened up, and he saw descending like a dove God's spirit coming upon him. 17 Look! Also, there was a voice from the heavens that said: "This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved."

So the answer to your question is that Jehovah God the Father anointed Jesus, who was the incarnate Jehovah God the Son, by Jehovah God the Holy Spirit, the One Triune God.

>Would the humble Lord and Christ be appreciative or incensed that many today take credit from his Father and incorrectly give it to him? This is the true meaning of blasphemy.

Jesus has already answered that question for you, again even in your own New World Translation. He has stated that "all may honor [Gk. present active "may keep on honoring"] the Son just as they honor the Father" and that "He that does not honor the Son does not honor the Father":

Jn 5:22-23 NWT. "22 For the Father judges no one at all, but he has committed all the judging to the Son, 23 in order that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He that does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him"

So the Watchtower, by its refusal to honor Jesus the Son, "just as they honor the Father" and punishes JWs who do, "does not honor the Father"!

But if you chose to believe the Watchtower rather than Jesus, and refuse to "honor the Son just as" you "honor the Father, then consider that verse above (and may others e.g. Jn 5:26-27; Act 10:41-42; 17:31; Rom 2:16; 2Cor 5:10; 2Tim 4:1) which warns that you are not going to be judged by the Watchtower, but both it and you are going to be judged by Jesus the Son!

Stephen E. Jones.
My other blogs: CreationEvolutionDesign & The Shroud of Turin